Gulliver, however, does not imply that the Lilliputians are ridiculous. Throughout the novel, Gulliver is sympathetic to the cultures he visits, never criticising them or finding anything funny, no matter how ludicrous they may seem to the reader. Instead, Swift leaves the satire relying on the difference between how things appear to us and how they appear to Gulliver, heightening in this manner both the comedic as well as the critical impact. The papers Gulliver must sign to gain his freedom are presented in a formal, self-important language, while the document is meaningless and self-contradictory.
Each article highlights the fact that Gulliver is powerful enough to violate all the articles without concern for his own safety. Dutta of Delhi University propounds,. He believes that colonisation confers civilised benefits.
From the English ethnocentric perspective, these places and people are legitimate objects for conquest and subjugation.
His islands are already populated by the so-called civilised, cultured people who reveal their gross and ugly side. These meaningless disagreements reflect the brutality of war, and show that Swift finds it futile. The Big-Endians and Little-Endians both share the same religious text, but disagree on how to interpret a passage. It is suggested that the Bible can be interpreted in multiple ways, that it is absurd and hollow to fight over how to interpret it when no one can be certain in such a situation.
The huge disproportion between the triviality of those issues and their consequences in terms of political actions — involving death, rebellion, exile — express a huge contempt for the political. Although it prevents a disaster, the act asserts his control over the Lilliputians—even by the most irreverent actions. It shows the significance of physical power, that can turn a crude act into a lifesaving gesture.
This also shows that, in Lilliput, practicality is forsaken for the sake of propriety. This further mocks English properness, which is valued over rationality, value or functionality—which are in fact the truly important things. This is also one of the instances where Swift employs excrement as a symbol to comment on society; he also used the image of flies defecating on his food in Brobdingnag.
If there is mixing, noble families lose their so-called dignity. Gulliver is, himself, of the middle class and enjoys social mobility as a result, reflecting the hypocrisy in the sentiments of the British. While he approves of class distinctions on principle, he also appears to be disgusted enough to find the signs of the upper class proof that they are greedy and malicious. The Lilliputians do not question their norms because they, in their sheltered ignorance, believe in no other way to conduct affairs.
When alternatives are discussed, the discussion ends in violent conflict. You are commenting using your WordPress. You are commenting using your Google account. You are commenting using your Twitter account.
You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email. Search for: Search. Magritte, La Condition Humaine. Robinson Crusoe. Dryden, J. Mac Flecknoe. Dutta, S. Erskine-Hill, H. Cambridge University Press. Hammond, B.
Milton Keynes. Higgins, I. The Odyssey. Pope, A. The Rape of the Lock. Said, E. Pantheon, The University of Michigan. Swift, J. Wagner, P. The Alden Press, Oxford. Wilding, M. Gulliver's Travels was unique in its day; it was not written to woo or entertain.
It was an indictment, and it was most popular among those who were indicted — that is, politicians, scientists, philosophers, and Englishmen in general. Swift was roasting people, and they were eager for the banquet. Swift himself admitted to wanting to "vex" the world with his satire, and it is certainly in his tone, more than anything else, that one most feels his intentions.
Besides the coarse language and bawdy scenes, probably the most important element that Dr. Bowdler deleted from the original Gulliver's Travels was this satiric tone. The tone of the original varies from mild wit to outright derision, but always present is a certain strata of ridicule. Bowdler gelded it of its satire and transformed it into a children's book.
After that literary operation, the original version was largely lost to the common reader. The Travels that proper Victorians bought for the family library was Bowdler's version, not Swift's.
What irony that Bowdler would have laundered the Travels in order to get a version that he believed to be best for public consumption because, originally, the book was bought so avidly by the public that booksellers were raising the price of the volume, sure of making a few extra shillings on this bestseller.
And not only did the educated buy and read the book — so also did the largely uneducated. However, lest one think that Swift's satire is merely the weapon of exaggeration, it is important to note that exaggeration is only one facet of his satiric method. Swift uses mock seriousness and understatement; he parodies and burlesques; he presents a virtue and then turns it into a vice. He takes pot-shots at all sorts of sacred cows.
Besides science, Swift debunks the whole sentimental attitude surrounding children. At birth, for instance, Lilliputian children were "wisely" taken from their parents and given to the State to rear. In an earlier satire A Modest Proposal , he had proposed that the very poor in Ireland sell their children to the English as gourmet food. Swift is also a name-caller.
Mankind, as he has a Brobdingnagian remark, is "the most pernicious race of little odious vermin that Nature ever suffered to crawl upon the surface of the earth. The island of Laputa, the island of pseudo-science, is literally in Spanish the land of "the whore. In addition, Swift mocks blind devotion. Gulliver, leaving the Houyhnhnms, says that he "took a second leave of my master, but as I was going to prostrate myself to kiss his hoof, he did me the honor to raise it gently to my mouth.
They were so enamored of reason that they did not realize that Swift was metamorphosing a virtue into a vice. In Book IV, Gulliver has come to idealize the horses.
0コメント